The impact of open access status on journal indexes of radiology journals/ (Record no. 9378)

000 -LEADER
fixed length control field 02274nam a22002657a 4500
001 - CONTROL NUMBER
control field 9378
003 - CONTROL NUMBER IDENTIFIER
control field OCLRC
005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION
control field 20260730103742.0
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION
fixed length control field 210324t xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
040 ## - CATALOGING SOURCE
Original cataloging agency OCLRC
100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Malkawi, Lna.--
700 ## - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name N Al Ryalat.,
700 ## - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name E Al Hadidi.,
700 ## - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name D Serrieh.,
245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT
Title The impact of open access status on journal indexes of radiology journals/
Statement of responsibility, etc. Lna Malkawi, Nosaiba Al-Ryalat, Enass Al Hadidi.,et al.
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. (IMPRINT)
Date of publication, distribution, etc. 2019
500 ## - GENERAL NOTE
General note (includes bibliographical references and index) DOI: 10.2214/AJR.19.21215
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC.
Summary, etc. OBJECTIVE. The impact of open access (OA) journals is still understudied in the field of radiology. In this study, we compared the measures of impact (e.g., CiteScore, citation count, SCImago Journal Rank) between OA and subscription radiology journals. MATERIALS AND METHODS. We collected data on journals included in the Scopus Source List on November 1, 2018. We filtered the list for radiology journals for the years from 2011 to 2017. OA journals covered by Scopus (Elsevier) are indicated as OA if the journal is listed in the Directory of Open Access Journals, the Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources, or both. We also compared citation metrics between OA and subscription radiology journals. RESULTS. The 2017 Scopus report included 265 radiology journals. The percentage of OA journals increased from 14.7% in 2011 to 21.9% in 2017 (49% increase). The median scholarly output and the citation count were both significantly lower in OA radiology journals compared with subscription journals (p < 0.001 and p = 0.016, respectively). The proportion of documents that received at least one citation was higher in OA (50.2%) compared with subscription journals (44.4%), but the difference was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION. This study found that the trend toward OA publishing in the fields of radiology and nuclear medicine has slowed in recent years, although the percent cited (i.e., the proportion of documents that receive at least one citation) is higher for OA journals. We believe the radiology field should be more supportive of OA publishing.
653 ## - INDEX TERM--UNCONTROLLED
Uncontrolled term Scopus,
653 ## - INDEX TERM--UNCONTROLLED
Uncontrolled term bibliometry,
653 ## - INDEX TERM--UNCONTROLLED
Uncontrolled term journals,
653 ## - INDEX TERM--UNCONTROLLED
Uncontrolled term open access,
653 ## - INDEX TERM--UNCONTROLLED
Uncontrolled term radiology,
942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA)
Koha item type Electronic Resources
Holdings
Withdrawn status Lost status Piece physical condition (Damaged Status) Not for loan Home library Current library (holdingbranch) Date acquired Total checkouts Date last seen Price effective from Koha item type
        Olivarez College Learning Resource Center Olivarez College Learning Resource Center 07/30/2026   07/30/2026 07/30/2026 Electronic Resources