Technology integration in instructional delivery of college faculty: (Record no. 9670)

000 -LEADER
fixed length control field 02396nam a22001937a 4500
001 - CONTROL NUMBER
control field 9670
003 - CONTROL NUMBER IDENTIFIER
control field OCLRC
005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION
control field 20260730103749.0
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION
fixed length control field 230130t xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
040 ## - CATALOGING SOURCE
Original cataloging agency OCLRC
082 ## - DEWEY DECIMAL CLASSIFICATION NUMBER
Classification number (Call Number) T 370 2015 315
100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Jacob, Joseph M.
245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT
Title Technology integration in instructional delivery of college faculty:
Sub Title basis for a balanced scorecard/
Statement of responsibility, etc. Joseph M. Jacob.
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. (IMPRINT)
Place of publication, distribution, etc. Parañaque City:
Name of publisher, distributor, etc. Olivarez College,
Date of publication, distribution, etc. 2016.
502 ## - DISSERTATION NOTE
Dissertation note Master Thesis
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC.
Summary, etc. This study attempted to assess the technology integration in instructional delivery of college faculty with an end view of developing an intended scorecard. Specifically, it sought to provide answers to the following research questions: 1. What is the profile of the respondents in terms of: 1.1. gender; 1.2. age; 1.3. course area; 1.4. academic qualifications; and, 1.5. teaching experience? 2. What are the current practices and the extent of technology integration in instructional delivery of the respondents? 3. How confident are the faculty-respondents in integrating technology in instructional delivery? 4. Is there a significant relationship among the respondents' confidence level, current practices, extent of integration, and technology integration barriers in their instructional delivery? 5. Is there a significant difference on the factors affecting technology integration in instructional delivery of respondents when grouped accordingly? 6. What technology barriers have placed great impact on instructional delivery of the respondents? 7. Based on the result of the study, what appropriate balance score card can be developed? Methodology This study utilized descriptive correlation method using statistical survey questionnaire by Gorder (2008) on Technology Integration Standards Configuration Matrix (TISCM) among eighty five (85) respondents who were general education and professional education faculty from Southville International School and Colleges, South SEED- LPDH College and SEED Academy, respectively. Frequency count and percentages were used to describe the profile of the respondents; while weighted means for the responses in survey questionnaire; and t-test, Pearson r, and ANOVA were utilized for the purpose of testing the hypotheses stated in this study.
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Subject Entry Technology integration.
942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA)
Koha item type Theses/Dissertation
Location (call number prefix code) T 370 2015 315
Holdings
Withdrawn status Lost status Piece physical condition (Damaged Status) Not for loan Home library Current library (holdingbranch) Date acquired Total checkouts Full call number Date last seen Price effective from Koha item type
        Olivarez College Learning Resource Center Graduate School Library 07/30/2026   T 370 2015 315 07/30/2026 07/30/2026 Theses/Dissertation