Revising procurement process in the mega city by the bay: (Record no. 9774)

000 -LEADER
fixed length control field 02482nam a22002177a 4500
001 - CONTROL NUMBER
control field 9774
003 - CONTROL NUMBER IDENTIFIER
control field OCLRC
005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION
control field 20260730103752.0
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION
fixed length control field 230131t xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
040 ## - CATALOGING SOURCE
Original cataloging agency OCLRC
082 ## - DEWEY DECIMAL CLASSIFICATION NUMBER
Classification number (Call Number) T 650 2019 350
100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Aberasturi, Ma. Cristina C.
245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT
Title Revising procurement process in the mega city by the bay:
Sub Title mitigating impediments on efficient public service/
Statement of responsibility, etc. Ma. Cristina C. Aberasturi.
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. (IMPRINT)
Place of publication, distribution, etc. Parañaque City:
Name of publisher, distributor, etc. Olivarez College,
Date of publication, distribution, etc. 2019.
502 ## - DISSERTATION NOTE
Dissertation note Master Thesis
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC.
Summary, etc. This study was endeavored to revisit and asses the procurement process implemented in the City of Parañaque. Further, it sought to determined underlying issues related to the process and significant differences in the assessment of the three groups on procurement process in terms of different aspects. This study utilized quantitative descriptive evaluative method using survey questionnaire among 120 respondents consisted of implementers (n=50), end users (n=50), and suppliers (n=20), respectively. Weighted mean and Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) were the statistical tools utilized for the treatment of data. Results showed that the procurement process in Parañaque City was found to e efficient (GWH=3.11) as assessed by the three groups of respondents, namely: the implementers (WH=3.18), end users (WM=2.89), and suppliers (WM-3.24) in terms of requisition and processing of papers (WM-3.16), budget appropriation (WM=3.25), prioritization (WM-3.13), bids and awards (WM-3.03), and delivery of service (WM=2.99). Some issues were raised related to procurement process as identified by the respondents, such as pricing aspect (WM=4.30), inefficient documentation procedures (WM-4.19), and redundancy in the process (i.e. signatories) (WM-4.18). There is a significant difference in the assessment of the three groups of respondents on procurement process in Parañaque City in terms of requisition and processing of papers (p-value=0.0041), budget appropriation (p-value=0.0033), prioritization (p-value=0.0269), and bids and awards (p-value=0.0305). However, there established no significant difference in terms of delivery of service (p-value=6.6532). A government procurement tool kit was designed as output of this study that would address related concerns.
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Subject Entry Requisition and processing of paper.
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Subject Entry Delivery of service.
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Subject Entry Budget appropriation.
942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA)
Koha item type Theses/Dissertation
Location (call number prefix code) T 650 2019 350
Holdings
Withdrawn status Lost status Piece physical condition (Damaged Status) Not for loan Home library Current library (holdingbranch) Date acquired Total checkouts Full call number Date last seen Price effective from Koha item type
        Olivarez College Learning Resource Center Graduate School Library 07/30/2026   T 650 2019 350 07/30/2026 07/30/2026 Theses/Dissertation