<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<mods xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.1" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-1.xsd">
  <titleInfo>
    <title>An exploration of faculty experiences with open access journal publishing at two Canadian comprehensive Universities</title>
  </titleInfo>
  <name type="personal">
    <namePart>Yates, Elizabeth</namePart>
    <role>
      <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">creator</roleTerm>
    </role>
  </name>
  <typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
  <originInfo>
    <place>
      <placeTerm type="code" authority="marccountry">xxu</placeTerm>
    </place>
    <dateIssued>2016</dateIssued>
    <issuance>monographic</issuance>
  </originInfo>
  <language>
    <languageTerm authority="iso639-2b" type="code">eng</languageTerm>
  </language>
  <physicalDescription>
    <form authority="marcform">print</form>
  </physicalDescription>
  <abstract>This exploratory study was intended to shed light on Canadian academics� participation in, knowledge of and attitudes towards Open Access (OA) journal publishing. The primary aim of the study was to inform the authors� schools� educational and outreach efforts to faculty regarding OA publishing. The survey was conducted at two Canadian comprehensive universities: Brock University (St. Catharines, Ontario) and Wilfrid Laurier University (Waterloo, Ontario) in 2014. Methods: A web-based survey was distributed to faculty at each university. The data was analyzed using descriptive statistics. Limitations: Despite the excellent response rates, the results are not generalizable beyond these two institutions. Results: The Brock response rate was 38%; the Laurier response rate was 23% from full-time faculty and five percent from part-time faculty. Brock and Laurier faculty members share common characteristics in both their publishing practices and attitudes towards OA. Science/health science researchers were the most positive about OA journal publishing; arts and humanities and social sciences respondents were more mixed in their Partnership: The Canadian Journal of Library and Information Practice and Research, vol. 11, no. 2 (2016) 2 perceptions; business participants were the least positive. Their concerns focused on OA journal quality and associated costs. Conclusion: While most survey respondents agreed that publicly available research is generally a good thing, this study has clearly identified obstacles that prevent faculty�s positive attitudes towards OA from translating into open publishing practices.</abstract>
  <note type="statement of responsibility">Elizabeth Yates.</note>
  <note>10.21083/partnership.v11i2.3703</note>
  <subject>
    <topic>open access, </topic>
  </subject>
  <subject>
    <topic>faculty, </topic>
  </subject>
  <subject>
    <topic>publishing, </topic>
  </subject>
  <subject>
    <topic>Canadian,</topic>
  </subject>
  <recordInfo>
    <recordContentSource authority="marcorg">OCLRC</recordContentSource>
    <recordCreationDate encoding="marc">210505</recordCreationDate>
    <recordChangeDate encoding="iso8601">20260730103744.0</recordChangeDate>
    <recordIdentifier source="OCLRC">9467</recordIdentifier>
  </recordInfo>
</mods>
