<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>01934nam a22002777a 4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">9471</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">OCLRC</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20260730103744.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">221026t        xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">OCLRC</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="082" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">T 370 2018 0040</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Ao Tai, Katrina Micah</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Interconnecting English for academic and professional purposes in senior high school  curriculum to purposive communication in general education curriculum for college in  2018:</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">breaking dichotomy through amalgamation/</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">Katrina Micah Ao Tai, Raymond Balon, Joanne Hugo, Hazel Anne Reyes, Ericson Yumang.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Para&#xF1;aque City:</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">Olivarez College,</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">2018.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="502" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Undergraduate Thesis</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">This study intended to find the interconnection between the curricula of English for  Academic and Professional Purposes in Senior High School and that of Purposive Communication  in the General Education for College in Olivarez College. It utilized perceptions rated by  respondents, comprised of English teachers teaching in Junior and Senior High and English  professors teaching in college. As a result, respondents noticed desirability on all-inclusive topics  such as: (a) Perceptions on the Course Description; (b) Perceptions on the Content of the subject;  (c) Perceptions on the Unit Credit/No. of Hours; (d) Perceptions on the Learning Competencies  of the Subject; (e) Perceptions on the Assessment Methods; (f) Perceptions on the Curriculum  Connectivity. Therefore, it was recommended to have a regular review of the curriculum to  ensure sustainability.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">English for Academic and Professional Purposes</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Senior High School curriculum</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Purposive Communication</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">General Education curriculum for college</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Balon, Raymond</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Hugo, Joanne</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Reyes, Hazel Anne</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Yumang, Ericson</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="942" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">THES</subfield>
    <subfield code="j">T 370 2018 0040</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">9471</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">9471</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="0">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="1">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="4">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="7">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">LRC</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">GR</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">2026-07-30</subfield>
    <subfield code="l">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="o">T 370 2018 0040</subfield>
    <subfield code="r">2026-07-30 10:37:44</subfield>
    <subfield code="w">2026-07-30</subfield>
    <subfield code="y">THES</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
