<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>01933nam a22002777a 4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">9623</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">OCLRC</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20260730103748.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">230130t        xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">OCLRC</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="082" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">T 364 2022 0027</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Chavez, Jared Benedict F.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Effectiveness of criminology course audit and revalida exercises:</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">basis for policy redirection/</subfield>
    <subfield code="c"> Jared Benedict F., Chavez, Rey A. Abana, Isagani A. Baguio, Lhowel Jhay F. Escobal, and Niel Mejos.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Para&#xF1;aque City:</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">Olivarez College,</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">2022</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="502" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Undergraduate Thesis</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">This study aimed to assess the level of effectiveness of Criminology course audit and revalida exercises (CARE) to serve as the basis for policy redirection. It aims to determine the demographic profile of the respondents, the respondent perceive the level of effectiveness of CARE, the problems faced by the students in courses audit through online learning and measures proposed to address the problems encountered. It further sought to find out if there is a significant difference in the assessments of the respondents on the level of effectiveness of criminology course audit and revalida exercises and the problems faced by the students in the course audit. To answer the aforementioned objectives, the hypotheses that there is no significant difference on the assessment of the two groups of respondents on the effectiveness of criminology course audit. The research method used in the study was a descriptive search method with 75 respondents. The statistical treatments used were simple percentage, Likert scale, weighted mean, and ANOVA.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Effectiveness.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Review.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Course.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Online learning.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Abana, Chavez, Rey A.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Baguio, Isagani A.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Escobal,  Lhowel Jhay F. </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Mejos, Neil</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="942" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">THES</subfield>
    <subfield code="j">T 364 2022 0027</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">9623</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">9623</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="0">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="1">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="4">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="7">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">LRC</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">GR</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">2026-07-30</subfield>
    <subfield code="l">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="o">T 364 2022 0027</subfield>
    <subfield code="r">2026-07-30 10:37:48</subfield>
    <subfield code="w">2026-07-30</subfield>
    <subfield code="y">THES</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
