<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>02533nam a22001817a 4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">9643</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">OCLRC</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20260730103749.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">230130t        xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">OCLRC</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="082" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">T 370 2003 230 </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Otazu, Veronica D.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Implementation of the guidance program of the public secondary schools in the division of city schools, Pasay city/</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">Veronica D. Otazu.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">2003.</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">Para&#xF1;aque City:</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">Olivarez College,</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="502" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Master Thesis</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">This study evaluated the implementation of the guidance program in four secondary public schools in the Division of Pasay during the school year 2002-2003. Specifically, it sought answers to the following questions: 1. What is the profile of the participants in terms of: 1.1 position; 1.2 highest educational attainment; and, 1.3 years of experience in the present position? 2. How did the guidance counselors, classroom teachers and school administrators evaluate the guidance program as to: 2.1 characteristics of the guidance program; 2.2 school guidance practices; and, 2.3 guidance services ? 3. Is there a significant difference in the evaluation of the principals, classroom teachers and guidance counselors as to the characteristics of the guidance program, school guidance practices and guidance services? 4. Is there a significant relationship between the profile of participants as to present position, highest educational attainment, and years of experience in the position and the variables of characteristics of the guidance program, school guidance practices and guidance  services?  5. What were the problems met in the implementation of  the guidance program?  The descriptive method of research was employed in the study.  The simple random sampling selected the 268 teacher  participants and the purposive sampling chose the 4 principals and the  11 counselors. Data were gathered through the profile of the  participants and a research-made and validated questionnaire that  evaluated the organization and administration of the guidance program,  the extent of guidance services rendered and the problems met in the  implementation of the guidance program. Scoring was made based on  the responses of the participants to those 5-point scale tools. Data  treatment was done through simple descriptive statistics such as  frequency count, percentage and weighted mean. Chi-square and  Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) were used in proving the study's  hypotheses.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="942" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">THES</subfield>
    <subfield code="j">T 370 2003 230 </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">9643</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">9643</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="0">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="1">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="4">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="7">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">LRC</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">GSL</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">2026-07-30</subfield>
    <subfield code="l">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="o">T 370 2003 230</subfield>
    <subfield code="r">2026-07-30 10:37:49</subfield>
    <subfield code="w">2026-07-30</subfield>
    <subfield code="y">THES</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
