<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>02509nam a22001937a 4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">9662</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">OCLRC</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20260730103749.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">230130t        xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">OCLRC</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="082" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">T 370 2015 305</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Salamanes, Lanie B.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Involvemnet of external stakeholders in the total school improvement: basis for a proposed mechanism for synergistic action</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">basis for a proposed mechanism for synergistic action</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">Lanie B. Salamanes.--</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">2015</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">Para&#xF1;aque City:</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">Olivarez College,</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="502" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Master Thesis</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">The study determined the degree of involvement of the internal stakeholders in the total improvement of Las Pi&#xF1;as National High School that served as basis for a proposed mechanism for synergistic action. Specifically, it sought answers to the following research questions posted thereto. 1. What is the extent of internal stakeholders' involvement in the improvement of the school? 2. Is there significant difference in the perceived extent of involvement of the groups of respondents? 3. What are the common challenges encountered by the stakeholders in  their involvement to the total school improvement?  4. Is there significant difference in the problems encountered by the  groups of respondents?  5. Based on the findings of the study, what appropriate mechanism for  synergistic action can be proposed?  The study adopted a descriptive research design because it  intended to generate statistical information used to describe the extent of  the internal stakeholders' involvement in the improvement of the school.  The instrument used to gather data was a self-made questionnaire based  on the DepEd Assessment of School Based Management Practices  consisting of its six (6) areas of concern. The instrument was validated by  a pool of evaluators consisted of Schools Division Supervisor, a Secondary  School Principal, a Master Teacher, the GPTA president and the SSG  president. The respondents in this study were the internal stakeholders of  the school that included the principal, department heads, teachers, parents  and students. The data gathered on extent of involvement of stakeholders  were analyzed using a four-point scale and the data on common challenges  encountered by the stakeholders were ranked accordingly. Descriptive  statistics were used in treating the data such as frequency, percentage,  ranking, weighted mean and t-test.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">K-12 Curriculum</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="942" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">THES</subfield>
    <subfield code="j">T 370 2015 305</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">9662</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">9662</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="0">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="1">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="4">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="7">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">LRC</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">GSL</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">2026-07-30</subfield>
    <subfield code="l">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="o">T 370 2015 303</subfield>
    <subfield code="r">2026-07-30 10:37:49</subfield>
    <subfield code="t">1</subfield>
    <subfield code="w">2026-07-30</subfield>
    <subfield code="y">THES</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
