01960nam a22001937a 45000010005000000030006000050050017000110080041000280400010000690820016000791000021000952450156001162600048002725020018003205201342003386500029016806500029017096500028017389766OCLRC20260730103752.0230130t        xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d  aOCLRC  aT 370 2002   aErni, Leuvina D.  aPerceived effectiveness of social studies instructions in the four public high schools in the division of Pasay City:ban assessment/cLeuvina D. Erni.  aParañaque City:bOlivarez College,c2002.  aMaster Thesis  aThe study was undertaken to assess the effectiveness of the social studies instruction in the four public high schools in the Division of Pasay City. Specifically, this study attempted to answer the following problems: 1. What is the profile of the respondents based on the following factors: A. Social Studies teachers a. educational attainment; b. civil status; c. field of concentration; d. preferred subject to teach; e. year level presently handled;  f. number of years in teaching Social Studies;  g. number of students per class;  h. textbook-student ratio;  i. seminar-workshop or training attended;  j. performance rating; and  k. class observation;  B. Social Studies Students;  studies?  a. age;  b. gender;  c. year level; and  d. parent's educational attainment?  2. How adequate are the instructional materials used in teaching social  3. How do the teachers and students assess the effectiveness of instructional  requirements in Social studies based on the following criteria:  a. social studies curriculum ;  b. teaching methodologies/strategies;  c. instructional aids; and  d. evaluation? 4. Is there a significant difference existing between the assessment of teachers  and students in Social studies instruction?  5. To what extent are problems encountered by the social studies teachers in  teaching social studies.  aSocial studies teachers.  aTeaching social studies.  aTeaching methodologies.