| 000 | 01196nam a22002177a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 9400 | ||
| 003 | OCLRC | ||
| 005 | 20260730103742.0 | ||
| 008 | 210405t xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 040 | _aOCLRC | ||
| 100 | _aCrim, Julia | ||
| 245 |
_aProblem with open access publishing in rediology/ _cJulia Crim.-- |
||
| 260 | _c2020 | ||
| 500 | _aDOI: 10.2214/AJR.20.22835 | ||
| 520 | _aOBJECTIVE. Open access publishing has grown exponentially and can be a means of increasing availability of scientific knowledge to readers who cannot afford to pay for access. This article discusses problems that can occur with open access and offers suggestions for ameliorating the problems facing radiology research because of poor-quality journals. CONCLUSION. Open access literature has loosed an avalanche of information into the radiology world, much of which has not been validated by careful peer review. To maintain academic integrity and serve our colleagues and patients, radiologists need to guard against shoddy science published in deceptive journals. | ||
| 653 | _adeceptive journal, | ||
| 653 | _aopen access, | ||
| 653 | _apeer review, | ||
| 653 | _apredatory journal, | ||
| 942 | _cELEC | ||
| 999 |
_c9400 _d9400 |
||