000			02396nam a22001937a 4500
001			9670
003			OCLRC
005			20260730103749.0
008			230130t xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
040			_aOCLRC
082			_aT 370 2015 315
100			_aJacob, Joseph M.
245			_aTechnology integration in instructional delivery of college faculty: _bbasis for a balanced scorecard/ _cJoseph M. Jacob.
260			_aParañaque City: _bOlivarez College, _c2016.
502			_aMaster Thesis
520			_aThis study attempted to assess the technology integration in instructional delivery of college faculty with an end view of developing an intended scorecard. Specifically, it sought to provide answers to the following research questions: 1. What is the profile of the respondents in terms of: 1.1. gender; 1.2. age; 1.3. course area; 1.4. academic qualifications; and, 1.5. teaching experience? 2. What are the current practices and the extent of technology integration in instructional delivery of the respondents? 3. How confident are the faculty-respondents in integrating technology in instructional delivery? 4. Is there a significant relationship among the respondents' confidence level, current practices, extent of integration, and technology integration barriers in their instructional delivery? 5. Is there a significant difference on the factors affecting technology integration in instructional delivery of respondents when grouped accordingly? 6. What technology barriers have placed great impact on instructional delivery of the respondents? 7. Based on the result of the study, what appropriate balance score card can be developed? Methodology This study utilized descriptive correlation method using statistical survey questionnaire by Gorder (2008) on Technology Integration Standards Configuration Matrix (TISCM) among eighty five (85) respondents who were general education and professional education faculty from Southville International School and Colleges, South SEED- LPDH College and SEED Academy, respectively. Frequency count and percentages were used to describe the profile of the respondents; while weighted means for the responses in survey questionnaire; and t-test, Pearson r, and ANOVA were utilized for the purpose of testing the hypotheses stated in this study.
650			_aTechnology integration.
942			_cTHES _jT 370 2015 315
999			_c9670 _d9670