Image from Google Jackets

The impact of course audit and revalida exercises program in Olivarez College: basis for BLEC preparation/ Mary Andrei Carillo, Allan Dale D. Eusebio, Jeffry R. Nabora, Justine Jay P. Lucaser, & Sonnyboy C. Batusen.

By: Contributor(s): Material type: TextPublication details: Parañaque City: Olivarez College, 2025.Subject(s): DDC classification:
  • T 364 2025 0090
Dissertation note: Undergraduate thesis. Summary: This quantitative study examined the impact of the Course Audit and Revalida Exercises Program on Board Licensure Examination preparations of Criminology students at Olivarez College - Parañaque. It aims to evaluate the impacts on student learning results and provide potential foundation development for the Course Audit and Revalida Exercise Program. Using a quantitative research design, the study involved Fourth-year Criminology students and Criminology Alumni AY: 2023-2024 as respondents. Data was collected through a researcher-made questionnaire focusing on various aspects of the program. Data was gathered using a survey questionnaire and online survey for Criminology Alumni and analyzed through weighted mean averages. The findings confirm that the CARE program is effectively meeting its goals across key components the Mock Board Examination, Lecturers, and Rationalization. The strong alignment in perceptions between fourth year criminology students and criminology alumni further supports the program's relevance and effectiveness. However, statistical analysis showed that Mock Board Examination and Rationalization have a significant difference in how they are assessed by different groups of respondents, pointing to possible differences in experience or perception, and the Lecturers there is no significant difference in how respondents assessed the role of lecturers in the program, the Lecturer's variable is seen uniformly. Additionally, the study revealed that both respondents experienced severe challenges in the CARE Program as part of their preparation for the BLEC were the insufficient time allocated for course audit sessions to cover all topics, difficulty in balancing course audit and revalida exercises with other academic responsibilities, and outdated or misaligned CARE Program materials. These findings indicate that the CARE program is well-received and contributes positively to the academic preparedness of students, emphasizing the value of continuous review mechanisms in professional programs.
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Cover image Item type Current library Home library Collection Shelving location Call number Materials specified Vol info URL Copy number Status Notes Date due Barcode Item holds Item hold queue priority Course reserves
Theses/Dissertation General Reference And Serial Section Olivarez College Learning Resource Center T 364 2025 0090 (Browse shelf) Available

Undergraduate thesis.

This quantitative study examined the impact of the Course Audit and Revalida Exercises Program on Board Licensure Examination preparations of Criminology students at Olivarez College - Parañaque. It aims to evaluate the impacts on student learning results and provide potential foundation development for the Course Audit and Revalida Exercise Program. Using a quantitative research design, the study involved Fourth-year Criminology students and Criminology Alumni AY: 2023-2024 as respondents. Data was collected through a researcher-made questionnaire focusing on various aspects of the program. Data was gathered using a survey questionnaire and online survey for Criminology Alumni and analyzed through weighted mean averages. The findings confirm that the CARE program is effectively meeting its goals across key components the Mock Board Examination, Lecturers, and Rationalization. The strong alignment in perceptions between fourth year criminology students and criminology alumni further supports the program's relevance and effectiveness. However, statistical analysis showed that Mock Board Examination and Rationalization have a significant difference in how they are assessed by different groups of respondents, pointing to possible differences in experience or perception, and the Lecturers there is no significant difference in how respondents assessed the role of lecturers in the program, the Lecturer's variable is seen uniformly. Additionally, the study revealed that both respondents experienced severe challenges in the CARE Program as part of their preparation for the BLEC were the insufficient time allocated for course audit sessions to cover all topics, difficulty in balancing course audit and revalida exercises with other academic responsibilities, and outdated or misaligned CARE Program materials. These findings indicate that the CARE program is well-received and contributes positively to the academic preparedness of students, emphasizing the value of continuous review mechanisms in professional programs.

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.